100% HUMAN REVIEW
100% Human Review
Human-Reviewed. Every Page.
300+ trained medical reviewers build your chronology by hand, the way we have for 2 Decades. No AI touches the file at any stage.
REVIEW MODEL
HUMAN ONLY
Trained reviewers
300+
DECADES OF EXPERIENCE
2 DECADES
Quality-control tiers
THREE
AI touches the file
ZERO
Deliverable
BY A NAMED PERSON
BEST FOR HIGH-STAKES LITIGATION
SAVES UP TO 40% VS. IN-HOUSE
THE MANUAL READ
EST. 2007
The Gold Standard, Still the Standard.
Some matters leave no room for interpretation. When a chronology has to hold up under cross-examination, it gets built the slow way: Expert reviewer or clinical expert opens the file, reads every page, takes notes, and assembles the timeline manually. That is the model that carried this business for 2 Decades before AttestaAI existed — and it is still the right one for the cases that can’t afford a machine’s judgment.
WHAT HUMAN REVIEW COVERS
What You Get With a Fully Human File.
WHAT A PERSON CATCHES
Judgment a Model Can’t Reproduce.
CONTRADICTORY RECORDS
TRANSPOSED DATES
PHANTOM VISIT REFERENCES
ILLOGICAL TREATMENT SEQUENCE
BEST FOR
When to Choose 100% Human.
High-stakes litigation, mass torts, medical malpractice, and any matter where your firm requires or prefers a fully human-reviewed deliverable with no AI involvement.
HIGH-STAKES LITIGATION
MASS TORTS
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
NO-AI DELIVERABLE
PETER T.
Republic Document Management
Other Models
Considering a faster model?
The hybrid workflow: machine speed on the full read, a trained reviewer on the judgment calls.
CLOSING CTA
Send Us a Case. See the Difference a
Human Read Makes.
500-page free trial. No credit card, no commitment. Cases under 500 pages are on us.
HUMAN-PREPARED · THREE-TIER QC · NAMED REVIEWER · ZERO AI
