The Platform
Capabilities
Resources
Featured Case Study
Mass tort, 41,000 pages, one chronology in nine days.
Company
AI + Human Review
Every file undergoes a formal audit against four defined criteria before delivery.
WHY IT RUNS ON TOP OF HUMAN REVIEW
They catch different failures.
HUMAN REVIEW
Three reviewers confirm the chronology is correct against the source, page by page.
THE AUDIT
Four criteria applied to the data as a whole — across sections, not within them.
CASE IN POINT
A verified chronology can still carry two spellings of the same provider across 400 pages — which surfaces the first time someone runs a search.
SOURCE P. 214
Dr. A. Ruiz · Ortho
SOURCE P. 388
Ruiz, Antonio M.D.
AUDIT FLAG
Same provider · two spellings
RESOLVED
Normalized before delivery
THE POINT
THE FOUR CRITERIA
The audit is not a spot check. Each criterion is applied to the record as a whole, and the file does not ship until all four hold.
PASS THRESHOLD
4 / 4
NO PARTIAL CREDIT
01
SOURCE-MATCHED
Every entry matches the source page it came from — dates, provider names, and clinical detail included.
02
ZERO OMISSIONS
Nothing in the production was skipped. Handwritten notes, poor-quality scans, and out-of-order pages are all accounted for.
03
NORMALIZED
The same provider, procedure, or date is recorded identically throughout the file — no drift between sections.
04
CITATION-READY
The result is something you can cite in a demand letter or a deposition without verifying it yourself first.
ANY FAILURE RETURNS THE FILE TO REVIEW BEFORE DELIVERY
— AUDIT GATE
DELIVERABLES
The difference between a file that was assembled and one that was tested.
NO EXCEPTIONS
QUALITY AUDIT
Send one case. It comes back tested against all four criteria,with every issue resolved before it reaches you.
ACCURATE · COMPLETE · CONSISTENT · RELIABLE